Ivanti Connect Secure vs ThreatLocker
Comprehensive side-by-side comparison of Ivanti Connect Secure vs ThreatLocker including features, integrations, customer segments, supported platforms, pros & cons, and company details. Find the best privileged access management software solution for your business needs.
Product Comparison
Secure Remote Access, Simplified.
ThreatLocker
Endpoint Security, Zero Trust Enabled.
Description
Ivanti Connect Secure is a robust SSL VPN solution designed to provide secure remote access to corporate resources for employees and contractors. It enables organizations to extend secure network access to any web-enabled device, regardless of...
Description
ThreatLocker is a next-generation endpoint security solution designed to proactively prevent cyberattacks, particularly ransomware. Unlike traditional security tools that rely on signature-based detection, ThreatLocker employs a 'default deny'...
No videos available
Videos (7)
Use Cases
Use Cases
Made For
Made For
Key Features
- Activity Tracking
- Access Controls/Permissions
- Patch Management
- Reporting/Analytics
- Intrusion Detection System
- Activity Monitoring
Key Features
- Real-Time Analytics
- Access Controls/Permissions
- Anomaly/Malware Detection
- Threat Response
- Real-Time Monitoring
- Remote Monitoring & Management
Industries
- Healthcare
- Financial Services
- Education
- Government
- Retail
Industries
- Healthcare
- Financial Services
- Government
- Manufacturing
- Legal
Customer Segments
- Small Businesses
- Mid-size Businesses
- Large Enterprises
Customer Segments
- Small Businesses
- Mid-size Businesses
- Large Enterprises
Supported Platforms
- Web
- Mobile
Supported Platforms
- Web
Pros
- Unified client simplifies management and reduces endpoint complexity.
- Strong security features, including MFA and integration with existing security infrastructure.
- Broad device support ensures accessibility for a diverse workforce.
Cons
- Potential complexity in initial configuration and integration with existing systems.
- Reliance on SSL/TLS protocols may require ongoing updates to address emerging vulnerabilities.
Pros
- Proactive protection against zero-day threats and ransomware
- Strong Zero Trust security posture through default deny approach
- Reduced attack surface and improved endpoint security
- Granular policy control for application and data access
- Effective containment of threats with Ringfencing
Cons
- Initial policy configuration can be time-consuming
- Potential for false positives requiring policy adjustments